2 research outputs found
Frequency and types of errors in six-year-olds on the task of sentence repetition
Zadatak ponavljanja reÄenica veÄ je davno prepoznat kao zadatak s visokom osjetljivoÅ”Äu i specifiÄnoÅ”Äu za otkrivanje posebnih jeziÄnih teÅ”koÄa (PJT-a), te s moguÄnoÅ”Äu prepoznavanja djece Äije su jeziÄne sposobnosti unutar granica urednosti. Ovaj se zadatak smatra dobrim kliniÄkim pokazateljem PJT-a. Sve do danas u literaturi nije doÅ”lo do suglasja meÄu autorima oko toga Å”to je u podlozi procesa ponavljanja reÄenica, toÄnije koji su mehanizmi obrade ukljuÄeni u ponavljanje. Autori koji se bave ponavljanjem reÄenica najÄeÅ”Äe navode da je zadatak ponavljanja reÄenica mjera jeziÄne sposobnosti, drugi smatraju da je dio radnog pamÄenja, treÄi tvrde da je viÅ”eznaÄno, toÄnije da ukljuÄuje veÄi broj komponenata, kao npr. gramatiÄko i rjeÄniÄko znanje, reprezentacije u dugoroÄnom pamÄenju te zadrÅ£avanje informacija u kratkoroÄnom pamÄenju. Ovaj diplomski rad usmjeren je na uÄestalost i vrste pogreÅ”aka koje se javljaju kod Å”estogodiÅ”njaka na zadatku ponavljanja reÄenica. Za potrebe ovoga rada upotrijebljen je zadatak ponavljanja reÄenica preuzet iz standardizacijske verzije Testa za procjenu predvjeÅ”tina Äitanja i pisanja; PredÄiP (KuvaÄ KraljeviÄ i LenÄek, 2012). Na temelju stratificiranog uzorka nasumiÄno je odabran 61 ispitanik te su analizirani njihovi odgovori samo na zadatku Ponavljanja reÄenica. Zadatak se sastojao do 10 reÄenica koje se meÄusobno razlikuju s obzirom na duljinu i sloÅ£enost. Uzorak ispitanika Äinila je jedna skupina koja se sastojala od 61 Å”estogodiÅ”njaka (N=61, 43 djevojÄice i 18 djeÄaka). Odgovori djece, toÄnije njihove reÄenice analizirane su u programu Microsoft Excel 2010 gdje se biljeÅ£ilo do kojih je pogreÅ”aka doÅ”lo tijekom ponavljanja. Nakon unosa odgovora, podaci su dalje preneseni u program za statistiÄku obradu podataka IMB SPSS 23 kako bi se ispitala statistiÄka znaÄajnost varijabli. Rezultati su pokazali da djeca ÄeÅ”Äe toÄno ponavljaju reÄenice, nego Å”to grijeÅ”e Å”to se i oÄekuje s obzirom da se radi o djeci urednog jeziÄnog razvoja. S obzirom na vrste pogreÅ”aka koje su se pojavile, zabiljeÅ£eno je ispuÅ”tanje rijeÄi, zamjena rijeÄi, dodavanje rijeÄi i promjena redoslijeda rijeÄi u reÄenici. NajÄeÅ”Äa vrsta pogreÅ”ke bilo je ispuÅ”tanje rijeÄi, ali valja napomenuti da je broj ispuÅ”tanja rijeÄi i broj zamjena rijeÄi bio veoma blizak (ne postoji statistiÄki znaÄajna razlika). BiljeÅ£ilo se i do kojih su promjena u reÄenici dovele navedene pogreÅ”ke. GrijeÅ”enje je rezultiralo i semantiÄkom i sintaktiÄkom promjenom reÄenice, u podjednakom opsegu. PogreÅ”ke su se najÄeÅ”Äe javljale na duljim i sloÅ£enijim reÄenicama.Frequency and types of errors in six-year-olds on the task of sentence repetition The task of sentence repetition is long ago recognized as a task of high sensitivity and specificity for detection of specific language impairment (SLI), and with possibility of recognition childen whose language abilities are typical. This task is considered as good clinical marker of SLI. Until today there are no compliance between authors about what is base of process of sentence repetition, rather which mechanisms of processing are included in repetition. Authors who are engaged in sentence repetition most often cite that task of sentence repetition is a measure of language ability, others consider that it is part of working memory, third claim that it is ambiguous, rather that include larger number of components, eg. grammatical and lexical knowledge, representations in long-term memory and keeping informations in short-term memory. This work is directed on frequency and types of errors which appear in six-year-olds on the task of sentence repetition. For the needs of this work, PredÄiP test (KuvaÄ KraljeviÄ and LenÄek, 2012) was used. On the base of stratified sample 61 examinees are randomly selected and their answers are analized only on the task of sentence repetition. The task is consisted of 10 sentences which differ considering length and complexity. The sample was one group which consist of 61 six-year-old (N=61, 43 girls and 18 boys). Children's answers, rather their sentences were written in program Microsoft Excel 2010 where was noted which errors appear during repeating. Ater entering the answers, data was further transmit in the program of statistical analysis IMB SPSS version 23 so could statistical relevance of variablese be examined. The results demonstrate that children more often repeat sentences accurately than they repeat it wrong. This is expected because those are children with tipical language development. Considering the type of errors which appear, dropping the word, word replacement, word adding and change of word order in sentence was noted. The most common error was dropping the word, but it is necessarily to note that a number of dropping the word and a number of word replacement was very close (there was no statistical relevance). It was also noted to which changes in sentences those errors led. Those mistakes resulted with semantic and sintactic changes of sentences, in similar extent. Erros appear most often in longer and complex sentences
Frequency and types of errors in six-year-olds on the task of sentence repetition
Zadatak ponavljanja reÄenica veÄ je davno prepoznat kao zadatak s visokom osjetljivoÅ”Äu i specifiÄnoÅ”Äu za otkrivanje posebnih jeziÄnih teÅ”koÄa (PJT-a), te s moguÄnoÅ”Äu prepoznavanja djece Äije su jeziÄne sposobnosti unutar granica urednosti. Ovaj se zadatak smatra dobrim kliniÄkim pokazateljem PJT-a. Sve do danas u literaturi nije doÅ”lo do suglasja meÄu autorima oko toga Å”to je u podlozi procesa ponavljanja reÄenica, toÄnije koji su mehanizmi obrade ukljuÄeni u ponavljanje. Autori koji se bave ponavljanjem reÄenica najÄeÅ”Äe navode da je zadatak ponavljanja reÄenica mjera jeziÄne sposobnosti, drugi smatraju da je dio radnog pamÄenja, treÄi tvrde da je viÅ”eznaÄno, toÄnije da ukljuÄuje veÄi broj komponenata, kao npr. gramatiÄko i rjeÄniÄko znanje, reprezentacije u dugoroÄnom pamÄenju te zadrÅ£avanje informacija u kratkoroÄnom pamÄenju. Ovaj diplomski rad usmjeren je na uÄestalost i vrste pogreÅ”aka koje se javljaju kod Å”estogodiÅ”njaka na zadatku ponavljanja reÄenica. Za potrebe ovoga rada upotrijebljen je zadatak ponavljanja reÄenica preuzet iz standardizacijske verzije Testa za procjenu predvjeÅ”tina Äitanja i pisanja; PredÄiP (KuvaÄ KraljeviÄ i LenÄek, 2012). Na temelju stratificiranog uzorka nasumiÄno je odabran 61 ispitanik te su analizirani njihovi odgovori samo na zadatku Ponavljanja reÄenica. Zadatak se sastojao do 10 reÄenica koje se meÄusobno razlikuju s obzirom na duljinu i sloÅ£enost. Uzorak ispitanika Äinila je jedna skupina koja se sastojala od 61 Å”estogodiÅ”njaka (N=61, 43 djevojÄice i 18 djeÄaka). Odgovori djece, toÄnije njihove reÄenice analizirane su u programu Microsoft Excel 2010 gdje se biljeÅ£ilo do kojih je pogreÅ”aka doÅ”lo tijekom ponavljanja. Nakon unosa odgovora, podaci su dalje preneseni u program za statistiÄku obradu podataka IMB SPSS 23 kako bi se ispitala statistiÄka znaÄajnost varijabli. Rezultati su pokazali da djeca ÄeÅ”Äe toÄno ponavljaju reÄenice, nego Å”to grijeÅ”e Å”to se i oÄekuje s obzirom da se radi o djeci urednog jeziÄnog razvoja. S obzirom na vrste pogreÅ”aka koje su se pojavile, zabiljeÅ£eno je ispuÅ”tanje rijeÄi, zamjena rijeÄi, dodavanje rijeÄi i promjena redoslijeda rijeÄi u reÄenici. NajÄeÅ”Äa vrsta pogreÅ”ke bilo je ispuÅ”tanje rijeÄi, ali valja napomenuti da je broj ispuÅ”tanja rijeÄi i broj zamjena rijeÄi bio veoma blizak (ne postoji statistiÄki znaÄajna razlika). BiljeÅ£ilo se i do kojih su promjena u reÄenici dovele navedene pogreÅ”ke. GrijeÅ”enje je rezultiralo i semantiÄkom i sintaktiÄkom promjenom reÄenice, u podjednakom opsegu. PogreÅ”ke su se najÄeÅ”Äe javljale na duljim i sloÅ£enijim reÄenicama.Frequency and types of errors in six-year-olds on the task of sentence repetition The task of sentence repetition is long ago recognized as a task of high sensitivity and specificity for detection of specific language impairment (SLI), and with possibility of recognition childen whose language abilities are typical. This task is considered as good clinical marker of SLI. Until today there are no compliance between authors about what is base of process of sentence repetition, rather which mechanisms of processing are included in repetition. Authors who are engaged in sentence repetition most often cite that task of sentence repetition is a measure of language ability, others consider that it is part of working memory, third claim that it is ambiguous, rather that include larger number of components, eg. grammatical and lexical knowledge, representations in long-term memory and keeping informations in short-term memory. This work is directed on frequency and types of errors which appear in six-year-olds on the task of sentence repetition. For the needs of this work, PredÄiP test (KuvaÄ KraljeviÄ and LenÄek, 2012) was used. On the base of stratified sample 61 examinees are randomly selected and their answers are analized only on the task of sentence repetition. The task is consisted of 10 sentences which differ considering length and complexity. The sample was one group which consist of 61 six-year-old (N=61, 43 girls and 18 boys). Children's answers, rather their sentences were written in program Microsoft Excel 2010 where was noted which errors appear during repeating. Ater entering the answers, data was further transmit in the program of statistical analysis IMB SPSS version 23 so could statistical relevance of variablese be examined. The results demonstrate that children more often repeat sentences accurately than they repeat it wrong. This is expected because those are children with tipical language development. Considering the type of errors which appear, dropping the word, word replacement, word adding and change of word order in sentence was noted. The most common error was dropping the word, but it is necessarily to note that a number of dropping the word and a number of word replacement was very close (there was no statistical relevance). It was also noted to which changes in sentences those errors led. Those mistakes resulted with semantic and sintactic changes of sentences, in similar extent. Erros appear most often in longer and complex sentences